Return-Path: X-Original-To: u7f01aa@mail.lrz-muenchen.de Delivered-To: u7f01aa@mail.lrz-muenchen.de Received: from lxmhs13.lrz-muenchen.de (mailha13.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.254.31]) by mailin.lrz-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B9E6A8FD for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de (mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.254.102]) by lxmhs13.lrz-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8FC80A231 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from scan4.mail.lrz.de (scan4.mail.lrz.de [10.156.6.38]) by mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:41 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in 38 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.086 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_HAS_SENDER=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_AN_AN_FQDN=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_DATE_HM_AN=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de ([10.156.6.1]) by scan4.mail.lrz.de (scan4.mail.lrz.de [10.156.6.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UkrZW7oPjErd for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postrelay2.lrz.de ([10.156.6.209] [10.156.6.209]) by mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:40 +0200 Received: from lawton.ewind.com (lawton.ewind.com [68.166.223.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by postrelay2.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB48C2400085 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lawton.ewind.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lawton.ewind.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8QFK7xo011640; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:20:07 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by lawton.ewind.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id p8QFK7PI011639; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:20:07 -0700 Message-Id: <201109261520.p8QFK7PI011639@lawton.ewind.com> X-Authentication-Warning: lawton.ewind.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cvnet@lawton.ewind.com using -f Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:55:27 +0100 Subject: Re: CVNet - An LCD monitor for research in vision From: "Ian M Andolina" To: "CVNet" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCL-MailScanner-From: i.andolina@ucl.ac.uk Sender: owner-cvnet@lawton.ewind.com Precedence: bulk > I found that the onset of the stimulus was delayed no less than 11 ms, > and no more than 14 ms relative to the vertical sync signal. In my > experience, this is more reliable than most CRTs which have up to 15 > msec delay between vsync and stim onset, depending on where the stimulus > is on the screen. Surely the problem here is the variance (which is compounded when changing amongst different grey levels). CRTs obviously have scanning artifacts, but there is no variance (it is a fixed lag difference vertically). My measurements using a photodiode and a TTL sent just after VBL (and estimating the time to stimulus on using scanline position) using Psych toolbox is that there is submilliscond latency and no variability on a CRT (apart from the vertical position lag). Looking at the 2D grey-grey transition time variances for most LCDs suggest they are will have problems over and above the latency lag. The 120Hz Samsung is a somewhat different beast, and Danko used a blanking trick (simulating a CRT!) to optimise the temporal characteristics. The other major issue is that 120Hz displays are twisted nematic displays, which if I understand correctly are always 6-bit per pixel resolution, and therefore unsuitable for the more demanding contrast level type stimuli. There are 120Hz 10-bit LCD panels, I assume Viewpixx (which has a built-in bit-depth extender) use one: http://www.vpixx.com/products/visual-stimulus-displays/viewpixx.html And Barco reference monitors are another (which also has a scanning backlight to mimic CRTs): http://www.barco.com/en/product/2146 Ian Andolina, UCL Dept. of Visual Neuroscience, London ------------------------------------------------------------------- To get information on using CVNet, send a note to: majordomo@mail.ewind.com In the body of the message, enter: info cvnet